The indemnity clause your staffing contract is probably missing
When a placed worker files a claim, the first question is not what happened. It is whose contract controls who pays. Here is what your indemnity clause needs to cover before that moment arrives.
Written by

Max Moio
Startups & FinTech
Max advises startups and fintech companies on corporate structuring, fundraising, and commercial contracts.

On this page
Staffing agencies are typically the employer of record. When you place a worker with a client, you generally remain the employer of record for purposes of payroll, taxes, and workers' compensation. The client is the co-employer for purposes of day-to-day supervision and direction. This split creates a legal gap that indemnity clauses are designed to close.
Co-employment means shared liability exposure. Because both the agency and the client exercise some degree of control over placed workers, both can be named in an employment claim. A harassment claim arising from a client's supervisor's conduct can still name the staffing agency if the agency had no process for workers to report issues or failed to investigate a complaint. The agency does not escape liability simply because the conduct happened at the client's site.
What your indemnity clause needs to cover
Client-controlled conduct must be the client's indemnity obligation. Your contract should require the client to indemnify you for claims arising from conduct that the client controlled: the client's supervisors' actions, the client's workplace conditions, the client's equipment, and the client's direction of the worker's day-to-day tasks. Without this language, you may share in the cost of a claim you had no ability to prevent.
Agency-controlled conduct must be yours. A mutual indemnity structure allocates liability to whoever controlled the relevant conduct. You take responsibility for your hiring practices, background checks, and onboarding. The client takes responsibility for supervision and site conditions. A one-sided indemnity clause that puts all risk on the agency is a red flag and should be negotiated.
Workers' compensation exclusivity does not protect the agency from all claims. Workers' compensation is the exclusive remedy for on-the-job injuries in most states, which limits a worker's ability to sue their employer. As the employer of record carrying the coverage, the agency is usually the party that bar protects. The client may fall outside it unless a court treats the client as a special or co-employer. That is why injured workers so often sue the client directly in personal injury, and why the client’s lawyers will immediately look to pierce the indemnity clause in your contract and push that cost back to you. Your indemnity clause needs to address this gap explicitly.
Classification indemnity: a separate risk
Client-directed misclassification is a distinct exposure. If a client pressures you to classify placed workers as independent contractors rather than employees, and those workers are later found to be employees, the reclassification liability can include back taxes, benefits, and penalties. Your contract should require the client to indemnify you for any classification liability that arises from the client's direction or requirements about how workers are engaged.
Put the classification decision in writing. If a client insists on a specific classification for placed workers, document that instruction in the contract and in writing before placement begins. A written record that the client directed the classification is the foundation of an indemnity claim if the classification is later challenged.
Insurance requirements and the indemnity connection
Indemnity clauses only work if the indemnifying party can pay. An indemnity obligation from a client with no insurance is worth very little. Your contract should require the client to carry general liability coverage, employment practices liability coverage, and in most cases workers' compensation coverage for their own employees, with your agency named as an additional insured on the relevant policies.
Certificate of insurance before placement begins. Require a current certificate of insurance from every client before the first worker is placed. Renew that certificate requirement annually. A lapsed policy at the time of a claim means the indemnity obligation exists on paper but has no coverage to back it.
Limitation of liability and what it does not cover
Cap your exposure on the agency side. Your contract should include a limitation of liability clause that caps the agency's exposure to the client, typically at the fees paid under the contract over a defined period. Without a cap, a single placement gone wrong can expose the agency to damages far exceeding the revenue the engagement generated.
Carve-outs from the cap. Most indemnity structures carve out gross negligence, intentional misconduct, and intellectual property claims from the limitation of liability. These carve-outs are standard and expected. What you want to avoid is a carve-out so broad that it swallows the cap entirely.
How to use Inhouse
Start by describing your current client contract structure: whether you have a standard agreement, whether clients often push back on your terms, and what types of workers you place and in what industries. Inhouse can produce a redlined version of your current staffing agreement with indemnity language strengthened, a co-employment risk summary for your specific placement model, and an insurance requirement checklist for client onboarding.
What gets routed to a lawyer: any active claim where indemnity is being disputed, any client contract negotiation involving unusually high-risk placements such as healthcare, construction, or security, and any situation where a client is insisting on contractor classification for workers you believe should be employees.
"I run a staffing agency that places [worker type] with [client type]. I have a standard client agreement but I am not sure my indemnity language is strong enough. I want to understand what it should cover and get a review of what I have."
Bottom line
The indemnity clause in your staffing contract is not boilerplate. It is the document that determines whether a worker injury, a harassment claim, or a classification audit costs you or your client. Most agencies are underprotected because their contracts were drafted for operational convenience, not legal risk allocation. Start with Inhouse to get your agreement reviewed and your indemnity structure mapped to your actual placement model, then have a licensed employment attorney sign off before you use it with new clients.
Legal notes
This article is general legal information, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Staffing agency liability, co-employment rules, workers' compensation exclusivity, and indemnity enforceability vary significantly by state and by industry. Some states impose additional requirements on staffing agencies, including licensing, bonding, and specific contract disclosures. Indemnity clauses are only as effective as the underlying insurance coverage and the financial capacity of the indemnifying party. Consult a licensed employment attorney before finalizing any staffing client agreement or responding to a co-employment claim.